Now this is what Beaujolais should taste like. Bright red berry aromas of strawberry preserve, some pomegranate and rhubarb, a little bit of mineral and warm, dry earth. A light palate that nonetheless has a surprising backbone of stony tannins, enveloped with enough acidity to really get your gastric juices flowing. There’s none of that sickly sweet, DuBoeuf banana / piña colada shit, which has become the tragic hallmark of too much Beaujolais.

2008 Henry Fessy Régnié Château des Reyssiers
Before purchasing this bottle I had no prior knowledge of Henry Fessy‘s wines. However, the fact that this is a Cru Beaujolais reassured me that it had to taste better than your average generic Beaujolais. Cru Beaujolais refers to a wine that comes from one of Beaujolais’ ten crus – designated appellations in the northern part of the region that produce superior-quality wines than the rest of the region. These ten crus are, moving roughly from north to south: St-Amour, Juliénas, Chénas, Moulin-à-Vent, Fleurie, Chiroubles, Morgon, Régnié, Brouilly, and Côte de Brouilly. This wine came from Régnié, the newest Beaujolais appellation (declared in 1988), which tends to make lighter and fruitier (but still balanced and well-structured) wines than most crus.
I probably shouldn’t belittle Georges DuBoeuf too much, however. (But as for belittling the wines sold under his name…) DuBoeuf almost single-handedly created the Beaujolais boom and the craze for Beaujolais Nouveau. (There’s too much to discuss regarding Beaujolais Nouveau so I won’t get into it here; if you’re curious for more info check out an article I published a little while ago on the subject.) Through his efforts Beaujolais became a veritable commodity; his name is positively synonymous with it. DuBoeuf controls over 10% of all Beaujolais wine, and his name is on the label of over 15% of Beaujolais sold anywhere in the world.

the face that launched a thousand hectares...
Though Beaujolais fell out of fashion in the late 1990′s, the region has recently undergone a revival in popularity – and more importantly, a revival in quality – since the 2003 vintage. Even some of the cheap wines are tasting better, though I still recommend that people stick to buying Cru Beaujolais since it’s a much safer choice.
Almost all non-Cru Beaujolais bears those signature banana, pear drop aromas that I mentioned earlier. This isn’t so much the product of the grape variety (all Beaujolais is made from a single variety, Gamay) as it is of the production processes. Most Beaujolais is made by carbonic maceration, in which whole bunches of grapes are dumped into a fermentation vat: the bottom 10 to 30% of the grapes are crushed and begin fermenting, releasing carbon dioxide gas that swathes the bunches above and causes them to undergo intracellular fermentation, which produces those candied fruit aromas.
A particular yeast strain (71B, for the enquiring minds), is also often used in much Beaujolais (including and especially the DuBoeuf wines). This yeast also promotes the production of banana candy aromas.
Now, I suppose there’s nothing particularly wrong with a wine that smells like it should be garnished with maraschino cherries, pineapple chunks, and those little paper umbrellas, but they are certainly not to my taste. The Gamay grape makes for wine that is eminently drinkable, but there’s no reason for it to be nigh unrecognizable from a glass of Welsh’s grape punch.
Back to the Fessy: with its lovely strawberry flavours and high acidity, I knew instantly what to make for dinner – roast chicken with strawberry-rhubarb sauce. Though I think I made the sauce a bit too sweet, it was still delicious. Food and wine pairing win!

see? doesn't that look tasty?
Recent Comments